[Eug-lug] Bandwidth limiting for apache2?
Allen Brown
abrown at peak.org
Sun Jan 23 08:52:57 PST 2005
I think I read an article in Linux Journal about the Linux Firewall
introduced in 2.4 that talked about doing this. I think doing
this at the firewall level would be the best approach because
it would have lower overhead than any other approach.
--
Allen Brown
work: Agilent Technologies non-work: http://www.peak.org/~abrown/
allen_brown at agilent.com abrown at peak.org
The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program.
--- Larry Niven
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, larry price wrote:
> google isn't giving me any love on this one.
>
> II'm trying to limit bot attacks against a webserver.
>
> I'm looking for a way to cap requests on a per ip basis,
> but don't want to block legitimate requests at all,
> I also want to be able to automatically detect, record, and block new attacks.
>
> I was looking at mod_throttle and mod_bandwidth but they are strictly for 1.3
>
> Is this a problem that is better dealt with at the packet filtering level?
>
> would it be worthwhile to attempt to port one of the aforementioned
> modules to apache 2.0 ?
>
> It's more important that requests be limited than that total outgoing
> bandwidth be limited and I have no problem with returning a 403 error
> to offending requests.
>
> Suggestions? Comments? Places to look for more docs.?
>
> --
> http://Zoneverte.org -- information explained
> Do you know what your IT infrastructure does?
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> euglug at euglug.org
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
>
More information about the EUGLUG
mailing list