[Eug-lug] Re: Google least private?
dooger watts
mikemcoo at efn.org
Mon Jun 11 14:03:14 PDT 2007
Woah Brian, you're right: google's one of the few who actually said no.
Had heard otherwise, but a quick search (google :^)) showed otherwise.
Glad to be wrong,
M
Brian Gallagher wrote:
> I thought Google stood up to the GOV on releasing personal data, at
> least to some degree; unlike others who folded like a cheap suit.
>
>
> On 6/11/07, *dooger watts * <mikemcoo at efn.org <mailto:mikemcoo at efn.org>>
> wrote:
>
> The bbc had a bit better hit on this group's decision to put google at
> the bottom of their best privacy list.
>
> Privacy International rated everyone--and nobody got good scores. But
> google got the worst.
>
> And Michael, all your references were to privacy as it pertains to the
> marketplace, and specifically to credit. To trust you with their money,
> there's certain information a lender has a right to know.
>
> The doctor's the only notable exception on your list--but I think
> Privacy International takes a less cynical view than yours.
>
> If someone has curiosity about toxic compounds or nitrates or
> gynecological details or radical political movements, they have a right
> to do their homework on these subjects without fearing that google's
> gonna red flag every sticky word on their list and turn searcher's id's
> over to the nsa--which they do.
>
> Michael Miller wrote:
> > I'm wondering why they did not talk about Yahoo and TJX. I use some
> > of google's services. I think every one should read google's TOS and
> > privacy policy.
> >
> > http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS?loc=US
> > http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacy.html
> >
> > If you want to keep your privacy do the following.
> >
> > 1) Don't buy a house
> > 2) Don't use credit cards
> > 3) Don't see a Doctor
> > 4) Don't use or pay for Health Insurance
> > 5) Don't belong to CostCo or Sam's Clubs or any grocery store
> frequent
> > shopper programs.
More information about the EUGLUG
mailing list