[Eug-lug] amd64 or x86?
Jared Ubelhor
crownedgriffin at gmail.com
Wed Aug 15 19:00:10 PDT 2007
x86 for sure. x64 is just a big pain in the ass with no benifits that I
could see. "Woot! Opera switches tabs .000001 seconds faster!"
On 8/15/07, Bob Miller <kbob at jogger-egg.com> wrote:
>
> A question for those of you who have 64-bit capable processors: Do you
> run an "amd64" or "x86" distro?
>
> I run x86 on my desktop, and have no problems. I run amd64 on my
> laptop. It has hardware incompatibilties galore (mostly from the
> video chip, ATI FireGL 5250). I've got an alternate x86 root on a USB
> drive, and it still has most of the compatibility issues. The biggest
> difference is that Adobe's flash plugin works on x86.
>
> So what are the rest of you running, and why?
>
> --
> Bob Miller K<bob>
> kbob at jogger-egg.com
> _______________________________________________
> EUGLUG mailing list
> euglug at euglug.org
> http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://euglug.org/pipermail/euglug/attachments/20070815/0cbcda81/attac=
hment.htm
More information about the EUGLUG
mailing list