[Eug-lug] Computer time

[Bob Miller]

Jacob Meuser wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:01:14PM -0800, Max Lemieux wrote:
> > Agreed, vi seems to be the universally present editor.
> 
> ed is the universal editor.

No, ed is the STANDARD text editor.
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html

I agree with Max.  Nano is a good, non-confusing editor.  I'll bet I've
been using emacs longer than anyone here -- I first used the original
TECo-based version on MIT-AI sometime in 1978.  But I'm still aware
that emacs is a bear to learn.

-- 
Bob Miller                              K<bob>
kbobsoft software consulting
http://kbobsoft.com                     kbob at jogger-egg.com